[PATCH] First step towards adding a parent map to the ASTContext.

Vane, Edwin edwin.vane at intel.com
Tue Feb 5 07:25:46 PST 2013

Oops. I see it there now. Got lost in the context.

From: Manuel Klimek [mailto:klimek at google.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 9:37 AM
To: reviews+D267+public+2ab3cabee59f81bc at llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com
Cc: cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; Jordan Rose; Vane, Edwin; joey.gouly at arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] First step towards adding a parent map to the ASTContext.

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Edwin Vane <edwin.vane at intel.com<mailto:edwin.vane at intel.com>> wrote:

  I don't know anything about the analyzer but it sounds like it is what is driving the design. For tools this all looks good if only a little heavy-handed. Your suggestions for improvements that would make parent map construction not touch the whole AST would be welcome.

  Question: does MatchASTVisitor::matchesAncestorOf() need fixing to use the new ASTContext::getParents()?

Yes, and that's part of the patch. At least if I didn't mess anything up? :)


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20130205/8dfb2368/attachment.html>

More information about the cfe-commits mailing list