[cfe-commits] [Patch][Review][Apply] Clarification of the advantages of the MIT license, the 2nd

Jonathan Sauer jonathan.sauer at gmx.de
Fri Aug 3 12:01:03 PDT 2012


>> turns out the features page was neither only one with an unclear description of clang's
>> licence over the GPL nor the page actually discussed in cfe-dev. So I made another
>> patch for comparison.html (attached).
>> Please review it and, if ok, commit.
>> With many thanks in advance,
>> Jonathan
> I can see why 'used' was confusing, but why do you also want to
> change, " projects that do not themselves want to be GPL" to "software
> that should not itself be GPL-licensed."? Maybe just the simpler
> "software that is not GPL-licensed"?

No particular reason, really. In fact, I like your version better, which is why I modified
my patch (attached) :-)

> Cheers,
> Rafael

Thanks for your correction,

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: comparison.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1047 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20120803/81f74012/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------

More information about the cfe-commits mailing list