[cfe-commits] [Patch][Review][Apply] Clarification of the advantages of the MIT license, the 2nd

Rafael EspĂ­ndola rafael.espindola at gmail.com
Fri Aug 3 10:48:41 PDT 2012

On 3 August 2012 11:00, Jonathan Sauer <jonathan.sauer at gmx.de> wrote:
> Hello again,
> turns out the features page was neither only one with an unclear description of clang's
> licence over the GPL nor the page actually discussed in cfe-dev. So I made another
> patch for comparison.html (attached).
> Please review it and, if ok, commit.
> With many thanks in advance,
> Jonathan

I can see why 'used' was confusing, but why do you also want to
change, " projects that do not themselves want to be GPL" to "software
that should not itself be GPL-licensed."? Maybe just the simpler
"software that is not GPL-licensed"?


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list