[cfe-commits] First version of AddressSanitizer docs; documentation for __has_feature(address_sanitizer)

[Kostya Serebryany]

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com>
> wrote:
> > A slightly edited version attached.
> > --kcc
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >> Please review the following documentation change.
> >>   - First version of AddressSanitizer docs
> >>   - Documentation for __has_feature(address_sanitizer)
> >> http://codereview.appspot.com/5430044
> >> Thanks,
> >> --kcc
>
> Looks fine.
>

Thanks!
r145276


> On a side note, why exactly doesn't address-sanitizer work at -O0?
>

The problem is temporary, the fix is being discussed at
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-November/045663.html
Another thing, is that we probably want to discourage using
AddressSanitizer with -O0 as it is too slow this way (too many redundant
memory accesses are instrumented).

--kcc


>
> -Eli
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20111128/090d8af6/attachment.html>