[cfe-commits] r122942 - in /cfe/trunk: include/clang/AST/ASTContext.h include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h include/clang/AST/Type.h include/clang/AST/TypeLoc.h include/clang/AST/TypeNodes.def include/clang/Serialization/ASTBitCodes.h lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp lib/AST/TypeLoc.cpp lib/AST/TypePrinter.cpp lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp lib/Serialization/ASTWriter.cpp

Abramo Bagnara abramo.bagnara at gmail.com
Sat Feb 26 00:38:49 PST 2011


Il 08/01/2011 21:19, John McCall ha scritto:
> 
> On Jan 8, 2011, at 8:46 AM, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
> 
>> Il 06/01/2011 02:58, John McCall ha scritto:
>>> Author: rjmccall
>>> Date: Wed Jan  5 19:58:22 2011
>>> New Revision: 122942
>>>
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=122942&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Introduce an AttributedType, but don't actually use it anywhere yet.
>>> The initial TreeTransform is a cop-out, but it's more-or-less equivalent
>>> to what we were doing before, or rather what we're doing now and might
>>> eventually stop doing in favor of using this type.
>>> I am simultaneously intrigued by the possibilities of rebuilding a
>>> dependent Attri
>>
>> Can you explain why you thought that to put a clang::Attr container in
>> AttributedType{Loc} was not the right thing to do?
> 
> None of this is set in stone.  I was avoiding Attr because it doesn't currently
> contain entries for all the type attributes, although clearly that can be
> changed.

AttributedType are used now or it's still work in progress?



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list