[cfe-commits] r122942 - in /cfe/trunk: include/clang/AST/ASTContext.h include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h include/clang/AST/Type.h include/clang/AST/TypeLoc.h include/clang/AST/TypeNodes.def include/clang/Serialization/ASTBitCodes.h lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp lib/AST/TypeLoc.cpp lib/AST/TypePrinter.cpp lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp lib/Serialization/ASTWriter.cpp

[John McCall]

On Feb 26, 2011, at 12:38 AM, Abramo Bagnara wrote:

> Il 08/01/2011 21:19, John McCall ha scritto:
>> 
>> On Jan 8, 2011, at 8:46 AM, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
>> 
>>> Il 06/01/2011 02:58, John McCall ha scritto:
>>>> Author: rjmccall
>>>> Date: Wed Jan  5 19:58:22 2011
>>>> New Revision: 122942
>>>> 
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=122942&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> Introduce an AttributedType, but don't actually use it anywhere yet.
>>>> The initial TreeTransform is a cop-out, but it's more-or-less equivalent
>>>> to what we were doing before, or rather what we're doing now and might
>>>> eventually stop doing in favor of using this type.
>>>> I am simultaneously intrigued by the possibilities of rebuilding a
>>>> dependent Attri
>>> 
>>> Can you explain why you thought that to put a clang::Attr container in
>>> AttributedType{Loc} was not the right thing to do?
>> 
>> None of this is set in stone.  I was avoiding Attr because it doesn't currently
>> contain entries for all the type attributes, although clearly that can be
>> changed.
> 
> AttributedType are used now or it's still work in progress?

A work in hopefully-brief hiatus, unfortunately.

John.