[Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged

[Evgenii Stepanov via Release-testers]

r279352

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis at google.com> wrote:
> It's a test for the new interceptor for prlimit.
> It could be disabled with __GLIBC_PREREQ for 2.13+.
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>> +Evgenii for msan.
>>
>> I suspect the community simply doesn't keep track of what glibc
>> version is required :-/
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> When I tested rc1 I found that some of the test suite wouldn't build on
>>> SLES11.3 as a consequence of changes to the tests.  At least some of the
>>> msan tests have been changed leverage features of glibc newer than is
>>> available on this platform.
>>>
>>> I asked about a minimum-required glibc but didn't hear back.  Is the minimum
>>> required glibc for 3.9 different from 3.8?
>>>
>>> When I tried rc1 on sles11.3 x86_64, msan's getrlimit test fails to build
>>> for lack of prlimit(). SLES11.3 has glibc 2.11.3. Is there a minimum
>>> required glibc? I think this test implementation previously used
>>> getrlimit(), which is present on glibc2.11.3.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Diana Picus via Release-testers
>>> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> All good on AArch64 - we've uploaded the binaries.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Diana
>>>>
>>>> On 19 August 2016 at 04:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
>>>> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>> > Dear testers,
>>>> >
>>>> > 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183.
>>>> >
>>>> > This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new
>>>> > comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are
>>>> > currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue.
>>>> >
>>>> > Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how
>>>> > everything goes.
>>>> >
>>>> > From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems
>>>> > (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Hans
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Release-testers mailing list
>>>> > Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
>>>> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Release-testers mailing list
>>>> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Brian