[Openmp-dev] Target CUDA RTL --> The primary context is inactive, set its flags to CU_CTX_SCHED_BLOCKING_SYNC

[Itaru Kitayama via Openmp-dev]

No, I take that back. Here's the backtrace:

(gdb) where
#0  0x00002aaaaaacd6c2 in clock_gettime ()
#1  0x00002aaaabd167fd in clock_gettime () from /usr/lib64/libc.so.6
#2  0x00002aaaac97837e in ?? ()
   from /usr/local/software/jureca/Stages/2019a/software/nvidia/driver/lib64/libcuda.so.1
#3  0x00002aaaaca3c4f7 in ?? ()
   from /usr/local/software/jureca/Stages/2019a/software/nvidia/driver/lib64/libcuda.so.1
#4  0x00002aaaac87240a in ?? ()
   from /usr/local/software/jureca/Stages/2019a/software/nvidia/driver/lib64/libcuda.so.1
#5  0x00002aaaac91bfbe in ?? ()
   from /usr/local/software/jureca/Stages/2019a/software/nvidia/driver/lib64/libcuda.so.1
#6  0x00002aaaac91e0d7 in ?? ()
   from /usr/local/software/jureca/Stages/2019a/software/nvidia/driver/lib64/libcuda.so.1
#7  0x00002aaaac848719 in ?? ()
   from /usr/local/software/jureca/Stages/2019a/software/nvidia/driver/lib64/libcuda.so.1
#8  0x00002aaaac9ba15e in cuDevicePrimaryCtxRetain ()
   from /usr/local/software/jureca/Stages/2019a/software/nvidia/driver/lib64/libcuda.so.1
#9  0x00002aaaac514757 in __tgt_rtl_init_device ()
   from /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/opt/clang/current/lib/libomptarget.rtl.cuda.so
#10 0x00002aaaab9b88bb in DeviceTy::init() ()
   from /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/opt/clang/current/lib/libomptarget.so
#11 0x00002aaaac279348 in std::__1::__call_once(unsigned long
volatile&, void*, void (*)(void*)) ()
   from /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/opt/clang/current/lib/libc++.so.1
#12 0x00002aaaab9b8d88 in device_is_ready(int) ()
   from /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/opt/clang/current/lib/libomptarget.so
#13 0x00002aaaab9c5296 in CheckDeviceAndCtors(long) ()
   from /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/opt/clang/current/lib/libomptarget.so
#14 0x00002aaaab9bbead in __tgt_target_data_begin_mapper ()
   from /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/opt/clang/current/lib/libomptarget.so
#15 0x00002aaaaabfaa58 in nest::SimulationManager::initialize() (this=0x5d3290)
    at /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/projects/nest-simulator/nestkernel/simulation_manager.cpp:76
#16 0x00002aaaaabf2c69 in nest::KernelManager::initialize() (this=0x5d3190)
    at /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/projects/nest-simulator/nestkernel/kernel_manager.cpp:88
#17 0x0000000000405769 in neststartup(int*, char***, SLIInterpreter&) (
    argc=argc at entry=0x7fffffff0a84, argv=argv at entry=0x7fffffff0a88, engine=...)
    at /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/projects/nest-simulator/nest/neststartup.cpp:87
#18 0x0000000000405650 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>)
    at /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/projects/nest-simulator/nest/main.cpp:42

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 5:22 AM Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I obtained a desired result (a crash) without a Spack environment.
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 1:13 PM Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > (gdb) where
> > #0  0x00002aaaaaacd6c2 in clock_gettime ()
> > #1  0x00002aaaabd347fd in clock_gettime () from /usr/lib64/libc.so.6
> > #2  0x00002aaaac98737e in ?? ()
> >    from /usr/local/software/jureca/Stages/2019a/software/nvidia/driver/lib64/libcuda.so.1
> > #3  0x00002aaaaca4b4f7 in ?? ()
> >    from /usr/local/software/jureca/Stages/2019a/software/nvidia/driver/lib64/libcuda.so.1
> > #4  0x00002aaaac88140a in ?? ()
> >    from /usr/local/software/jureca/Stages/2019a/software/nvidia/driver/lib64/libcuda.so.1
> > #5  0x00002aaaac92afbe in ?? ()
> >    from /usr/local/software/jureca/Stages/2019a/software/nvidia/driver/lib64/libcuda.so.1
> > #6  0x00002aaaac92d0d7 in ?? ()
> >    from /usr/local/software/jureca/Stages/2019a/software/nvidia/driver/lib64/libcuda.so.1
> > #7  0x00002aaaac857719 in ?? ()
> >    from /usr/local/software/jureca/Stages/2019a/software/nvidia/driver/lib64/libcuda.so.1
> > #8  0x00002aaaac9c915e in cuDevicePrimaryCtxRetain ()
> >    from /usr/local/software/jureca/Stages/2019a/software/nvidia/driver/lib64/libcuda.so.1
> > #9  0x00002aaaac523757 in __tgt_rtl_init_device ()
> >    from /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/opt/clang/current/lib/libomptarget.rtl.cuda.so
> > #10 0x00002aaaaaca28bb in DeviceTy::init() ()
> >    from /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/opt/clang/current/lib/libomptarget.so
> > #11 0x00002aaaac297348 in std::__1::__call_once(unsigned long
> > volatile&, void*, void (*)(void*)) ()
> >    from /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/opt/clang/current/lib/libc++.so.1
> > #12 0x00002aaaaaca2d88 in device_is_ready(int) ()
> >    from /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/opt/clang/current/lib/libomptarget.so
> > #13 0x00002aaaaacaf296 in CheckDeviceAndCtors(long) ()
> >    from /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/opt/clang/current/lib/libomptarget.so
> > #14 0x00002aaaaaca5ead in __tgt_target_data_begin_mapper ()
> >    from /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/opt/clang/current/lib/libomptarget.so
> > #15 0x00002aaaab3a4958 in nest::SimulationManager::initialize() (this=0x5d3480)
> >     at /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/projects/nest-simulator/nestkernel/simulation_manager.cpp:76
> > #16 0x00002aaaab39cbb9 in nest::KernelManager::initialize() (this=0x5d3380)
> >     at /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/projects/nest-simulator/nestkernel/kernel_manager.cpp:88
> > #17 0x0000000000405769 in neststartup(int*, char***, SLIInterpreter&) (
> >     argc=argc at entry=0x7ffffffee554, argv=argv at entry=0x7ffffffee558, engine=...)
> >     at /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/projects/nest-simulator/nest/neststartup.cpp:87
> > #18 0x0000000000405650 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>)
> >     at /p/project/cjzam11/kitayama1/projects/nest-simulator/nest/main.cpp:42
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 12:55 PM Itaru Kitayama
> > <itaru.kitayama at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >  and when this happens, no signal can get caught immediately by the system.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 12:52 PM Itaru Kitayama
> > > <itaru.kitayama at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I see often when executing my work-in-the-progress offloading app on X86
> > > > with an older NVIDIA GPU (sm_35). Can someone enlighten me on this so I
> > > > can solve it quickly?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,