[Openmp-dev] [Openmp-commits] Openmp-commits post from pawel.osmialowski at arm.com requires approval

[Hahnfeld, Jonas via Openmp-dev]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Openmp-commits [mailto:openmp-commits-bounces at lists.llvm.org]
> On Behalf Of C Bergström via Openmp-commits
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 11:44 AM
> To: openmp-commits at lists.llvm.org
> Subject: Re: [Openmp-commits] Openmp-commits post from
> pawel.osmialowski at arm.com requires approval
> 
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Paul Osmialowski <pawel.osmialowski at arm.com>
> > To: pawel.osmialowski at arm.com, jonathan.l.peyton at intel.com,
> > james.molloy at arm.com
> > Cc: amara.emerson at arm.com, openmp-commits at lists.llvm.org,
> > renato.golin at linaro.org
> > Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 09:37:02 +0000
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] D19319: ARM Limited license agreement from the
> > copyright/patent holder
> > pawosm01 added a reviewer: jmolloy.
> >
> > Repository:
> >   rL LLVM
> >
> > http://reviews.llvm.org/D19319
> 
> I'm not sure how much of my ARMv8 work is actually copyright PathScale, but
> I don't think every company which contributes to llvm/clang/llvm-openmp
> needs to push some "license" agreement. If a license agreement is required
> it would make more sense for some non-profit to receive a copy and steward
> it..
> 
> I'm not opposed to ARM's push, but it just caught me as weird. Is this some
> oddball ARM internal legal requirement?

Hi Chris,

As it seems you are one of the mailing list moderators: Could you then please approve this mail? It's important that the review mails get through to the others subscribed to this list...

To the content itself: First, I'm no lawyer, so just my opinion here:
>From what LICENSE.txt says at the top:
"[...] As a contributor,
you agree to allow your code to be used under both. [...]"

The license agreement from Intel is probably in place because it was developed solely by Intel prior to contributing it to the LLVM project. But that's just a guess.
I think Jim was involved in this process, maybe he can help here...

Cheers,
Jonas

> 
> 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: openmp-commits-request at lists.llvm.org
> > To:
> > Cc:
> > Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 02:34:43 -0700
> > Subject: confirm 586d4c2de9d1f7404c82499e85785392ce705d55
> > If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
> > Mailman will discard the held message.  Do this if the message is
> > spam.  If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
> > with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
> > to the list.  The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
> > of the body of the reply.
> _______________________________________________
> Openmp-commits mailing list
> Openmp-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openmp-commits
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5868 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/openmp-dev/attachments/20160422/271d00a3/attachment.bin>