[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX vs -fopenmp and clang search library search path

[Chris Lattner]

> On May 15, 2015, at 3:47 PM, C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote:
> 
> Adding a prefix may be desireable to avoid conflicts or confusion.

Sure, OTOH, we have precedent with this.  There were many c++ standard libraries before libc++.  I'm ok with LLVM's implementation being the defacto implementation, aren't you?

-Chris

> 
> 
> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 5:35 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On May 13, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Peyton, Jonathan L
>> <jonathan.l.peyton at intel.com> wrote:
>> 
>> We understand that iomp is undesirable.  What we don’t know is what name is
>> desirable.
>> 
>> What name is desirable instead of iomp?  Do we want to link via…
>> -lllvmomp
>> -llvmomp
>> -lclomp
>> -lcomp
>> -lnotintelomp ( just kidding J )
>> … Some other name?  I get the feeling someone outside of Intel should make
>> this choice.
>> 
>> 
>> Why not -lomp?
>> 
>> -Chris
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openmp-dev mailing list
>> Openmp-dev at dcs-maillist2.engr.illinois.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/openmp-dev
>>