[Openmp-dev] CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX vs -fopenmp and clang search library search path

[Klemm, Michael]

How about naming the library “lvmomp”.  Then you can use –llvmomp to link (cf. libiberty ☺)

Cheers,
        -michael

Dr.-Ing. Michael Klemm
Senior Application Engineer
Software and Services Group
Developer Relations Division
Phone    +49 89 9914 2340
Cell         +49 174 2417583


From: openmp-dev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:openmp-dev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Chandler Carruth
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 6:34 PM
To: David Chisnall; Peyton, Jonathan L
Cc: openmp-dev at dcs-maillist2.engr.illinois.edu; cfe-dev
Subject: Re: [Openmp-dev] CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX vs -fopenmp and clang search library search path

My suggestion had been 'libllomp' which would be '-lllomp'. But I don't really care.

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:32 AM David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk<mailto:David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk>> wrote:
On 13 May 2015, at 17:29, Peyton, Jonathan L <jonathan.l.peyton at intel.com<mailto:jonathan.l.peyton at intel.com>> wrote:
>
> What name is desirable instead of iomp?  Do we want to link via…
> -lllvmomp
> -llvmomp
> -lclomp
> -lcomp
> -lnotintelomp ( just kidding J )
> … Some other name?  I get the feeling someone outside of Intel should make this choice.

[Joining in the bikeshed]
-llomp seems most consistent (first letter of LLVM + omp, consistent with first letter of GNU + omp, first letter of Intel + omp).

David
Intel GmbH
Dornacher Strasse 1
85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Lamprechter, Hannes Schwaderer, Douglas Lusk
Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456
Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895
Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/openmp-dev/attachments/20150515/a939f05c/attachment.html>