[Openmp-dev] [LLVMdev] OpenMP 3.1 Implementation Complete

[Andrey Bokhanko]

No, just changing defaults -- subject to code reviewers approval.

As I said before, I prefer to leave library naming to library pros.

Andrey


On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Jack Howarth
<howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> So you plan on switching and enabling the openmp library defaults as
> well as changing the openmp library name at the same time?
>         Jack
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:04 PM, andreybokhanko
> <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote:
>> It will come on next week.
>>
>> I'd like to give a chance to everyone to raise their objections first.
>>
>> Yours,
>> Andrey
>>
>>> 8 мая 2015 г., в 18:30, Jack Howarth <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> написал(а):
>>>
>>> Is there a proposed patch yet for switching the -fopenmp support over
>>> to the openmp library instead of libgomp? I realize the call to rename
>>> the library may be complicating this process. Perhaps the switch of
>>> the default library should be done first under the current libiomp5
>>> name and that tested for a few days first before using follow on
>>> patches to switch the library name to llomp or whatever. I would be
>>> nice to no longer have to feed clang "-fopenmp=libiomp5 -Xclang
>>> -fopenmp=libiomp5".
>>>           Jack
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Andrey Bokhanko
>>> <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>> Congratulations! Would you like to add a blurb to the release notes
>>>>> for the next release?
>>>>
>>>> Sure! Will do.
>>>>
>>>> Yours,
>>>> Andrey
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Openmp-dev mailing list
>>>> Openmp-dev at dcs-maillist2.engr.illinois.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/openmp-dev