[Openmp-dev] On Improving the Build System revisited

[John Leidel (jleidel)]

Why not structure this as an LLVM "project" as defined in http://llvm.org/docs/Projects.html? 


John D. Leidel

On May 30, 2014, at 7:30 AM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote:

> 
> On 30/05/2014 15:18, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>    Has anyone started on integrating the openmp build into the llvm build yet? If not, I would suggest we start by borrowing the build machinery files from polly as the starting point. Like polly, openmp provides a support library for the compiler and should be built in the tools subdirectory..
> 
> Polly is completely different to the OpenMP runtime. Polly uses LLVM libraries, and can be seen as part of the compilation host toolchain, while this is an independent runtime library that runs on the target. So the build systems are tangential.
> 
> 
>> Also, the polly cmake  and autogen directories are fairly spartan so they should be easy to refashion for openmp.
> 
> There's a simple CMake setup on one of the GitHub branches of this project, C. Bergström may know better if they can be contributed. Either way that's closer to what's needed here.
> 
> Alp.
> 
> 
>>           Jack
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openmp-dev mailing list
>> Openmp-dev at dcs-maillist2.engr.illinois.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/openmp-dev
> 
> -- 
> http://www.nuanti.com
> the browser experts
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openmp-dev mailing list
> Openmp-dev at dcs-maillist2.engr.illinois.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/openmp-dev