[Openmp-commits] [openmp] [lld] [compiler-rt] [flang] [lldb] [libunwind] [libcxxabi] [llvm] [libcxx] [mlir] [clang-tools-extra] [clang] [libc] [clang] static operators should evaluate object argument (reland) (PR #80108)
Younan Zhang via Openmp-commits
openmp-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jan 30 23:55:11 PST 2024
================
@@ -651,16 +651,12 @@ class InlayHintVisitor : public RecursiveASTVisitor<InlayHintVisitor> {
// implied object argument ([over.call.func]), the list of provided
// arguments is preceded by the implied object argument for the purposes of
// this correspondence...
- //
- // However, we don't have the implied object argument
- // for static operator() per clang::Sema::BuildCallToObjectOfClassType.
llvm::ArrayRef<const Expr *> Args = {E->getArgs(), E->getNumArgs()};
// We don't have the implied object argument through a function pointer
// either.
if (const CXXMethodDecl *Method =
dyn_cast_or_null<CXXMethodDecl>(Callee.Decl))
- if (Method->isInstance() &&
- (IsFunctor || Method->hasCXXExplicitFunctionObjectParameter()))
+ if (IsFunctor || Method->hasCXXExplicitFunctionObjectParameter())
----------------
zyn0217 wrote:
So we may have an implied object argument for *static* operator() calls without an explicit object parameter, while it was only applied previously to *non-static* (`isInstance()`) operator() calls.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80108
More information about the Openmp-commits
mailing list