[Openmp-commits] [clang-tools-extra] [mlir] [libcxxabi] [compiler-rt] [clang] [flang] [llvm] [libc] [libcxx] [openmp] [clang] Avoid -Wshadow warning when init-capture named same as class field (PR #74512)
Nikolas Klauser via Openmp-commits
openmp-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 11 08:32:02 PST 2024
philnik777 wrote:
> @philnik777 I agree strongly with @Fznamznon. If `this` is not captured there is no actual shadowing in that they do not occupy encompassing scope, and so removing one declaration would not give you access to the other variable.
I don't disagree that this is technically not shadowing, but I don't think that's clear from a users perspective. e.g.
```c++
void someFunc(int someVal) {
// assume 100 LoC here
auto someLambda = [](int someVal) {
// another 100 LoC here
return someVal + 40; // IMO it's trivial to confuse this with the `someVal` from `someFunc`
};
}
```
It looks like Clang even has a warning for this specific case and GCC considers it shadowing too: https://godbolt.org/z/Y16njoPxh, which makes me think that people want this - at least as a separate flag.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74512
More information about the Openmp-commits
mailing list