[Openmp-commits] [lldb] [openmp] [clang] [clang-tools-extra] [lld] [libunwind] [mlir] [llvm] [flang] [compiler-rt] [BranchFolding] Fix missing predecessors of landing-pad (PR #77608)
Phoebe Wang via Openmp-commits
openmp-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 11 00:52:24 PST 2024
================
@@ -1363,6 +1363,14 @@ bool BranchFolder::OptimizeBlock(MachineBasicBlock *MBB) {
MachineBasicBlock *Pred = *(MBB->pred_end()-1);
Pred->ReplaceUsesOfBlockWith(MBB, &*FallThrough);
}
+ // Add rest successors of MBB to successors of FallThrough. Those
+ // successors are not directly reachable via MBB, so it should be
+ // landing-pad.
+ for (auto SI = MBB->succ_begin(), SE = MBB->succ_end(); SI != SE; ++SI)
+ if (*SI != &*FallThrough && !FallThrough->isSuccessor(*SI)) {
+ assert((*SI)->isEHPad() && "Bad CFG");
+ FallThrough->copySuccessor(MBB, SI);
+ }
----------------
phoebewang wrote:
This doesn't answer the questions. My questions are:
- Why can't put the code in `ReplaceUsesOfBlockWith`? The `isSuccessor` can make sure the same BB won't add again;
- Is it possible the added BB might be removed latter. We don't have a mechanism to remove the dead successors. Would it be a problem if we keep an edge to dead BBs?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77608
More information about the Openmp-commits
mailing list