[Openmp-commits] [PATCH] D95820: [OpenMP] Add bounds to num_teams clause (OpenMP 5.1)

[Andrey Churbanov via Phabricator via Openmp-commits]

AndreyChurbanov added inline comments.


================
Comment at: openmp/runtime/test/teams/kmp_num_teams.c:68
+  }
+  if (a != nteams * nthreads) {
+    fprintf(stderr, "error: a (%d) != nteams * nthreads (%d)\n", a,
----------------
hoy wrote:
> AndreyChurbanov wrote:
> > jdoerfert wrote:
> > > hoy wrote:
> > > > Hello, I'm wondering if `nteams` could have an uninitialized use here. It is defined conditionally at line 41. I was seeing `nteams` had a random value. This happened in a very specific testing environment and sorry I cannot provide you a repro. Thanks.
> > > When the encountering thread finished executing the target construct it should have also executed line 41. That said, there might be a capturing issue here. Do we need to capture `nteams` as `shared` explicitly to avoid a firstprivate copy in the target teams region?
> > Once target construct does not have `shared` clause, `map(tofrom:..)` probably needed for `a`, `nteams` and `nthreads`.
> OK, I'm seeing `nteams` has different addresses in the master and team threads. Maybe `shared` is needed.
I tried to fix the test in commit 091e8da.
Strictly the `a` needs to be in `in_reduction` and `reduction`, but I hope atomic to work here.  Otherwise `map(tofrom)` should be changed to `in_reduction(+:a) reduction(+:a)`.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D95820/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D95820