[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][Vector] Reject scalable masks in maskedload/maskedstore emulation (PR #223316)
Hung-Kuan Tseng
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Thu Oct 8 05:13:37 PDT 2026
Tim096 wrote:
Thanks for the updates, @jay87406. I checked the latest revision on top of current main: `vector-emulate-masked-load-store.mlir` passes and both scalable cases keep the `vector.maskedload`/`vector.maskedstore`. LGTM from my side. Since you don't have commit access either, once you have the approvals you need, ask explicitly for someone to land it; reviewers otherwise assume you can merge yourself.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/223316
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list