[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][ODS] Require the value after oilist keyword (PR #229334)
Mehdi Amini
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Tue Oct 6 01:26:43 PDT 2026
================
@@ -3002,8 +3002,16 @@ func.func @omp_target_update_invalid_motion_type(%map1 : memref<?xi32>) {
// -----
-func.func @omp_target_map_must_specify_both_var_ptr_ptr_args(%arg : memref<?xi32>) {
+func.func @omp_map_var_ptr_ptr_missing_type(%arg : memref<?xi32>) {
+ // expected-error @below {{expected attribute value}}
%map1 = omp.map.info var_ptr(%arg : memref<?xi32>, tensor<?xi32>) map_clauses(to) capture(ByRef) var_ptr_ptr(%arg : memref<?xi32>, ) name("") -> memref<?xi32>
+ return
+}
+
+// -----
+
+func.func @omp_target_map_must_specify_both_var_ptr_ptr_args(%arg : memref<?xi32>) {
+ %map1 = "omp.map.info"(%arg, %arg) <{map_capture_type = #omp.variable_capture_kind<ByRef>, map_type = #omp.clause_map_flags<to>, operandSegmentSizes = array<i32: 1, 1, 0, 0>, var_ptr_type = tensor<?xi32>}> : (memref<?xi32>, memref<?xi32>) -> memref<?xi32>
----------------
joker-eph wrote:
What is this test exercising? This is a generic format, so I'm not clear on where oilist is involved here?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/229334
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list