[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][Python] Support `has_trait` for operations (PR #188492)
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Thu Mar 26 08:18:59 PDT 2026
github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp,h -- mlir/include/mlir-c/ExtensibleDialect.h mlir/include/mlir-c/IR.h mlir/include/mlir/Bindings/Python/IRCore.h mlir/include/mlir/IR/ExtensibleDialect.h mlir/lib/Bindings/Python/IRCore.cpp mlir/lib/CAPI/IR/ExtensibleDialect.cpp mlir/lib/CAPI/IR/IR.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````
:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/mlir/lib/CAPI/IR/IR.cpp b/mlir/lib/CAPI/IR/IR.cpp
index 3d06ba654..c7ecab15a 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/CAPI/IR/IR.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/CAPI/IR/IR.cpp
@@ -651,8 +651,10 @@ MlirContext mlirOperationGetContext(MlirOperation op) {
return wrap(unwrap(op)->getContext());
}
-bool mlirOperationNameHasTrait(MlirStringRef opName, MlirTypeID traitTypeID, MlirContext context) {
- return OperationName(unwrap(opName), unwrap(context)).hasTrait(unwrap(traitTypeID));
+bool mlirOperationNameHasTrait(MlirStringRef opName, MlirTypeID traitTypeID,
+ MlirContext context) {
+ return OperationName(unwrap(opName), unwrap(context))
+ .hasTrait(unwrap(traitTypeID));
}
MlirLocation mlirOperationGetLocation(MlirOperation op) {
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/188492
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list