[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][vector] Clarify the semantics of gather/scatter indexing (nfc) (PR #181357)

Renato Golin llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Tue Mar 17 03:59:39 PDT 2026


================
@@ -2082,23 +2082,27 @@ def Vector_GatherOp :
     3-D and the result is 2-D:
 
     ```mlir
-    func.func @gather_3D_to_2D(
-        %base: memref<?x10x?xf32>, %ofs_0: index, %ofs_1: index, %ofs_2: index,
-        %indices: vector<2x3xi32>, %mask: vector<2x3xi1>,
-        %fall_thru: vector<2x3xf32>) -> vector<2x3xf32> {
-            %result = vector.gather %base[%ofs_0, %ofs_1, %ofs_2]
-                                   [%indices], %mask, %fall_thru : [...]
-            return %result : vector<2x3xf32>
+      %base: memref<?x10x?xf32>, %ofs_0: index, %ofs_1: index, %ofs_2: index,
+      %indices: vector<2x3xi32>, %mask: vector<2x3xi1>,
+      %fall_thru: vector<2x3xf32>) -> vector<2x3xf32> {
+          %result = vector.gather %base[%ofs_0, %ofs_1, %ofs_2]
+                                 [%indices], %mask, %fall_thru : [...]
     }
     ```
 
     The indexing semantics are then,
 
     ```
-    result[i,j] := if mask[i,j] then base[i0, i1, i2 + indices[i,j]]
+    result[i,j] := if mask[i,j] then base[%ofs_0, %ofs_1, %ofs_2 + indices[i,j]]
----------------
rengolin wrote:

nit: maybe better to use `%result`, `%mask` etc. to make it clear that it's the same IR as above.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/181357


More information about the Mlir-commits mailing list