[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][arith] Add ValueBoundsOpInterface external models for the arith integer CeilDiv, RemSI, RemUI, MaxUI, MinUI. (PR #204966)
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Sun Jun 28 00:48:05 PDT 2026
================
@@ -190,6 +268,58 @@ struct MaxSIOpInterface
cstr.bound(value) >= rhs;
}
};
+
+struct MinUIOpInterface
+ : public ValueBoundsOpInterface::ExternalModel<MinUIOpInterface,
+ arith::MinUIOp> {
+ void populateBoundsForIndexValue(Operation *op, Value value,
+ ValueBoundsConstraintSet &cstr) const {
+ auto minOp = cast<arith::MinUIOp>(op);
+ assert(value == minOp.getResult() && "invalid value");
+
+ // ValueBoundsConstraintSet models values as signed integers (e.g. an i8
+ // 0xff is treated as -1, not 255). For an unsigned minimum it is enough
+ // that a single operand is provably non-negative: minui(x, y) is in
+ // [0, y] whenever y >= 0 (and symmetrically for x).
+ bool lhsNonNegative =
+ ValueBoundsConstraintSet::isProvablyNonNegative(minOp.getLhs(), cstr);
+ bool rhsNonNegative =
+ ValueBoundsConstraintSet::isProvablyNonNegative(minOp.getRhs(), cstr);
+ if (!lhsNonNegative && !rhsNonNegative)
+ return;
+
+ cstr.bound(value) >= 0;
+ if (lhsNonNegative) {
+ AffineExpr lhs = cstr.getExpr(minOp.getLhs());
+ cstr.bound(value) <= lhs;
+ }
+ if (rhsNonNegative) {
+ AffineExpr rhs = cstr.getExpr(minOp.getRhs());
+ cstr.bound(value) <= rhs;
+ }
+ }
+};
+
+struct MaxUIOpInterface
+ : public ValueBoundsOpInterface::ExternalModel<MaxUIOpInterface,
+ arith::MaxUIOp> {
+ void populateBoundsForIndexValue(Operation *op, Value value,
+ ValueBoundsConstraintSet &cstr) const {
+ auto maxOp = cast<arith::MaxUIOp>(op);
+ assert(value == maxOp.getResult() && "invalid value");
+
+ // See MinUIOpInterface comment
+ if (!ValueBoundsConstraintSet::isProvablyNonNegative(maxOp.getLhs(),
+ cstr) ||
+ !ValueBoundsConstraintSet::isProvablyNonNegative(maxOp.getRhs(), cstr))
+ return;
+
+ AffineExpr lhs = cstr.getExpr(maxOp.getLhs());
+ AffineExpr rhs = cstr.getExpr(maxOp.getRhs());
+ cstr.bound(value) >= lhs;
+ cstr.bound(value) >= rhs;
+ }
----------------
nirhersh wrote:
i agree, @matthias-springer would you like me to implement this now or keep it for future PR?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/204966
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list