[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][x86] Decouple Accumulator from ADD-Based Vector Contractions (over loops) (PR #204327)
Adam Siemieniuk
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Wed Jul 22 02:24:39 PDT 2026
================
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+// RUN: mlir-opt %s -transform-interpreter -cse -split-input-file | FileCheck %s
+
+!vecA = vector<1x1x2xbf16>
+!vecB = vector<1x2x16xbf16>
+!vecC = vector<1x16xf32>
+!memrefA = memref<1x1x2xbf16, strided<[2048, 32, 1], offset: ?>>
+!memrefB = memref<1x2x32xbf16, strided<[2048, 64, 1], offset: ?>>
+!memrefC = memref<1x32xf32, strided<[64, 1], offset: ?>>
+#map = affine_map<(d0, d1, d2, d3) -> (d0, d1, d3)>
+#map1 = affine_map<(d0, d1, d2, d3) -> (d0, d3, d2)>
+#map2 = affine_map<(d0, d1, d2, d3) -> (d1, d2)>
+
+func.func @brmatmul_acc_mv(%arg0: memref<16x64x32xbf16>, %arg1: memref<16x32x64xbf16>,
+ %arg2: memref<64x64xf32>) -> memref<64x64xf32> {
+ %0 = ub.poison : f32
+ %1 = ub.poison : bf16
+ %c0 = arith.constant 0 : index
+ %c64 = arith.constant 64 : index
+ %c16 = arith.constant 16 : index
+ %c32 = arith.constant 32 : index
+ %c1 = arith.constant 1 : index
+ %c2 = arith.constant 2 : index
+ scf.for %arg3 = %c0 to %c64 step %c1 {
+ scf.for %arg4 = %c0 to %c64 step %c32 {
+ %subview = memref.subview %arg2[%arg3, %arg4] [1, 32] [1, 1]
+ : memref<64x64xf32> to !memrefC
+ %2 = vector.transfer_read %subview[%c0, %c0], %0 {in_bounds = [true, true]}
+ : !memrefC, !vecC
+ %3 = vector.transfer_read %subview[%c0, %c16], %0 {in_bounds = [true, true]}
+ : !memrefC, !vecC
+
+ %4:2 = scf.for %arg5 = %c0 to %c16 step %c1 iter_args(%arg6 = %2, %arg7 = %3) -> (!vecC, !vecC) {
+ %5:2 = scf.for %arg8 = %c0 to %c32 step %c2 iter_args(%arg9 = %arg6, %arg10 = %arg7) -> (!vecC, !vecC) {
+
+ %subview_0 = memref.subview %arg0[%arg5, %arg3, %arg8] [1, 1, 2] [1, 1, 1]
+ : memref<16x64x32xbf16> to !memrefA
+ %subview_1 = memref.subview %arg1[%arg5, %arg8, %arg4] [1, 2, 32] [1, 1, 1]
+ : memref<16x32x64xbf16> to !memrefB
+
+ %6 = vector.transfer_read %subview_0[%c0, %c0, %c0], %1 {in_bounds = [true, true, true]}
+ : !memrefA, !vecA
+ %7 = vector.transfer_read %subview_1[%c0, %c0, %c0], %1 {in_bounds = [true, true, true]}
+ : !memrefB, !vecB
+ %8 = vector.transfer_read %subview_1[%c0, %c0, %c16], %1 {in_bounds = [true, true, true]}
+ : !memrefB, !vecB
+
+ %9 = vector.contract {indexing_maps = [#map, #map1, #map2], iterator_types =
+ ["reduction", "parallel", "parallel", "reduction"], kind = #vector.kind<add>} %6, %7, %arg9
+ {unroll_shape = array<i64: 1, 1, 16, 2>} : !vecA, !vecB into !vecC
+ %10 = vector.contract {indexing_maps = [#map, #map1, #map2], iterator_types =
+ ["reduction", "parallel", "parallel", "reduction"], kind = #vector.kind<add>} %6, %8, %arg10
+ {unroll_shape = array<i64: 1, 1, 16, 2>} : !vecA, !vecB into !vecC
+
+ scf.yield %9, %10 : !vecC, !vecC
+ }
+ scf.yield %5#0, %5#1 : !vecC, !vecC
+ }
+
+ vector.transfer_write %4#1, %subview[%c0, %c16] {in_bounds = [true, true]}
+ : !vecC, !memrefC
+ vector.transfer_write %4#0, %subview[%c0, %c0] {in_bounds = [true, true]}
+ : !vecC, !memrefC
+ }
+ }
+
+ return %arg2 : memref<64x64xf32>
+}
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: @brmatmul_acc_mv
----------------
adam-smnk wrote:
nit: Could you expand checks to capture the new chain with contract etc.?
Currently I don't clearly see what rewrite is happening.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/204327
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list