[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][EmitC] Create a pass to add a reflection map to a class (PR #205464)

[Andrzej Warzyński]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+// RUN: mlir-opt -split-input-file --mlgo-add-reflection-map="included-field-attrs=emitc.field_ref,emitc.field_ref_2 \
+// RUN: excluded-field-attrs="emitc.other_field"" %s | FileCheck %s '-D$QUOTE=\22'
+
+/// Tests that a reflection map is created for fields with a certain attribute.
+
+emitc.class @foo {
+  emitc.field @fieldName0 : !emitc.array<1xf32>  {emitc.field_ref = ["another_feature"]}
+  emitc.field @fieldName1 : !emitc.array<1xf32>  {emitc.field_ref = ["some_feature"]}
+  emitc.func @bar() {
+    return
+  }
+}
+
+// CHECK:       emitc.class @foo {
+// CHECK-NEXT:    emitc.field @fieldName0 : !emitc.array<1xf32> {emitc.field_ref = ["another_feature"]}
+// CHECK-NEXT:    emitc.field @fieldName1 : !emitc.array<1xf32> {emitc.field_ref = ["some_feature"]}
+// CHECK-NEXT:    emitc.field @reflectionMap : !emitc.opaque<"const std::map<std::string, char*>"> = 
+// CHECK-SAME:    #emitc.opaque<"{ { [[$QUOTE]]another_feature[[$QUOTE]], reinterpret_cast<char*>(&fieldName0) }, { [[$QUOTE]]some_feature[[$QUOTE]], reinterpret_cast<char*>(&fieldName1) } }">  
+// CHECK-NEXT:    emitc.func @getBufferForName(%{{.*}}: !emitc.opaque<"std::string">) -> !emitc.ptr<!emitc.opaque<"char">> {
+// CHECK-NEXT:      %[[MAP0:.*]] = get_field @reflectionMap : !emitc.opaque<"const std::map<std::string, char*>">
+// CHECK-NEXT:      %[[VAL0:.*]] = member_call_opaque %[[MAP0]] "at"({{.*}}) : !emitc.opaque<"const std::map<std::string, char*>">, (!emitc.opaque<"std::string">) -> !emitc.ptr<!emitc.opaque<"char">>
+// CHECK-NEXT:      return %[[VAL0]] : !emitc.ptr<!emitc.opaque<"char">>
+// CHECK-NEXT:    }
+// CHECK-NEXT:    emitc.func @bar() {
+// CHECK-NEXT:      return
+// CHECK-NEXT:    }
+// CHECK-NEXT:  }
+
+// -----
+
+/// Test that a reflection map is created for fields with a certain named attribute
+/// but not ones with an attribute present in the ignore-attributes option.
+
+emitc.class @fooExcluded {
+  emitc.field @fieldName0 : !emitc.array<1xf32>  {emitc.field_ref = ["another_feature"]}
+  emitc.field @fieldName1 : !emitc.array<1xf32>  {emitc.other_field = ["some_feature"]}
+  emitc.func @bar() {
+    %0 = get_field @fieldName0 : !emitc.array<1xf32>
+    return
+  }
+}
----------------
banach-space wrote:

[nit] If the first test contains only "included" attributes, then I'd expect the second to only contain "excluded" attributes. And then some other test could mix both.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/205464