[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][Linalg] enable scalar lowering for linalg.pack (PR #178222)

[Han-Chung Wang]

================
@@ -80,6 +80,90 @@ static LogicalResult inlinePayload(OpBuilder &b, LinalgOp linalgOp,
   return success();
 }
 
+/// Generate the body of the innermost loop of the scalar implementation
+/// of `pack` operation.
+static void generatePackOpScalarImplementationBody(PackOp packOp,
+                                                   OpBuilder &builder,
+                                                   Location loc,
+                                                   ValueRange ivs) {
+  // Note: `ivs` are already in the correct order, possibly interchanged based
+  // on `dims_pos`. However, connecting the loops with the access patterns is
+  // difficult - What is the relation between the position of the tile loop
+  // and the point loop? However, if we interchange `ivs` once more to go to
+  // the canonical blocking format: ABCabc, this connection becomes trivial:
+  // Each point loop is pointLoopsOffset + inputRank away from the tiled loop.
+  ArrayRef<int64_t> dimsToInnerBlock = packOp.getInnerDimsPos();
+  ArrayRef<int64_t> dimsToOuterBlock = packOp.getOuterDimsPerm();
+
+  SmallVector<Value> interchangedIvs = ivs;
+  SmallVector<int64_t> interchangeVector =
+      computeInterchangeFromDimPos(dimsToInnerBlock, packOp.getSourceRank());
+  interchangedIvs = interchange<Value>(interchangedIvs, interchangeVector,
+                                       /*offset=*/packOp.getSourceRank());
+  if (!dimsToOuterBlock.empty()) {
+    interchangeVector =
+        computeInterchangeFromDimPos(dimsToOuterBlock, packOp.getSourceRank());
+    interchangedIvs =
+        interchange<Value>(interchangedIvs, interchangeVector, /*offset=*/0);
+  }
+
+  SmallVector<OpFoldResult> tiles = packOp.getMixedTiles();
----------------
hanhanW wrote:

This is dead code carried over from IREE. :)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178222