[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][vector] Don't fold in_bounds for scalable vector dimensions (PR #213506)

[llvmlistbot at llvm.org]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- mlir/lib/Dialect/Vector/IR/VectorOps.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/Vector/IR/VectorOps.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/Vector/IR/VectorOps.cpp
index ba007dd43..35e93ef81 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/Vector/IR/VectorOps.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/Vector/IR/VectorOps.cpp
@@ -5377,8 +5377,8 @@ static bool isInBounds(TransferOp op, int64_t resultIdx, int64_t indicesIdx) {
   // op.getIndices()[indicesIdx] + vectorType < dim(op.getSource(), indicesIdx)
   if (op.getShapedType().isDynamicDim(indicesIdx))
     return false;
-    // Scalable dimensions are `vscale` times larger at runtime, so the static
-    // size is only a lower bound and cannot prove that the transfer fits.
+  // Scalable dimensions are `vscale` times larger at runtime, so the static
+  // size is only a lower bound and cannot prove that the transfer fits.
   if (op.getVectorType().getScalableDims()[resultIdx])
     return false;
   Value index = op.getIndices()[indicesIdx];

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/213506