[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][canonicalize] Add filter-dialects option (PR #193041)

[Mehdi Amini]

joker-eph wrote:

> But it looks conceptually the same as having a separate set for name-only. 

>From very far maybe, but they still have different purposes: one is a registration the other isn't. Adding a dialect by name to the registry isn't "registering" it the same way.

I just pushed an update trying to address all this by completely splitting this at the API level, PTAL?
(also added verification in the PassManager now, it does not rely on the canonicalizer anymore).

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/193041