[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][vector] Rename ConvertVectorToLLVM to NaiveConvertVectorToLLVM (PR #160055)

[Nicolas Vasilache]

nicolasvasilache wrote:

> With that in mind, I feel we should work on creating those new passes and moving the corresponding transformations out of this gigantic pass before thinking about the final name. WDYT?

My 2 cents on this is while I would love to see it happen, the reality is driven by priorities. 
For instance @rengolin and team have already made great progress towards such batteries for x86 AFAIK but I am unsure of the state / priorities of other vendors.
The way I read the RFC, renaming also serves to make room for such pipelines to exist, rather than incorrectly assuming that ---since there is already one pipelin, the work is done.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/160055