[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][SideEffects][MemoryEffects] Modified LICM to be more aggressive when checking movability of ops with MemWrite effects (PR #155344)
Mehdi Amini
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Tue Oct 21 12:46:16 PDT 2025
================
@@ -58,62 +60,407 @@ static bool canBeHoisted(Operation *op,
op, [&](OpOperand &operand) { return definedOutside(operand.get()); });
}
-size_t mlir::moveLoopInvariantCode(
- ArrayRef<Region *> regions,
- function_ref<bool(Value, Region *)> isDefinedOutsideRegion,
- function_ref<bool(Operation *, Region *)> shouldMoveOutOfRegion,
- function_ref<void(Operation *, Region *)> moveOutOfRegion) {
- size_t numMoved = 0;
+/// Merges srcEffect's Memory Effect on its resource into the
+/// resourceConflicts map, flagging the resource if the srcEffect
+/// results in a conflict.
+///
+/// \param resourceConflicts The map to store resources' conflicts status.
+/// \param srcEffect The effect to merge into the resourceConflicts map.
+/// \param srcHasConflict Whether the srcEffect results in a conflict based
+/// on higher level analysis.
+///
+/// resourceConflicts is modified by the function and will be non-empty
+static void mergeResource(MemoryConflictMap &resourceConflicts,
+ const MemoryEffects::EffectInstance &srcEffect,
+ bool srcHasConflict) {
+
+ TypeID srcResourceID = srcEffect.getResource()->getResourceID();
+
+ bool srcIsAllocOrFree = isa<MemoryEffects::Allocate>(srcEffect.getEffect()) ||
+ isa<MemoryEffects::Free>(srcEffect.getEffect());
+
+ LDBG() << "<Merging Effect> : \"" << srcEffect.getEffect()->getEffectName()
+ << " on resource <" << srcEffect.getResource()->getName() << ">\""
+ << "\n";
+
+ bool conflict = srcHasConflict || srcIsAllocOrFree;
+
+ auto [dstIt, inserted] = resourceConflicts.insert(
+ std::make_pair(srcResourceID, std::make_pair(conflict, srcEffect)));
+ if (inserted) {
+ LDBG() << ". . . . "
+ << "Effect inserted to map"
+ << "\n";
+ return;
+ }
- for (Region *region : regions) {
- LDBG() << "Original loop:\n" << *region->getParentOp();
+ // resource already in use
+ bool dstHasConflict = dstIt->second.first;
+ auto dstEffect = dstIt->second.second;
- std::queue<Operation *> worklist;
- // Add top-level operations in the loop body to the worklist.
- for (Operation &op : region->getOps())
- worklist.push(&op);
+ if (dstHasConflict) {
+ LDBG() << ". . . . "
+ << "Resource has existing conflict from Effect Mem"
+ << dstEffect.getValue() << "\n";
+ return;
+ }
- auto definedOutside = [&](Value value) {
- return isDefinedOutsideRegion(value, region);
- };
+ bool srcWrite = isa<MemoryEffects::Write>(srcEffect.getEffect());
+ bool dstRead = isa<MemoryEffects::Read>(dstEffect.getEffect());
+ bool readBeforeWrite = dstRead && srcWrite;
- while (!worklist.empty()) {
- Operation *op = worklist.front();
- worklist.pop();
- // Skip ops that have already been moved. Check if the op can be hoisted.
- if (op->getParentRegion() != region)
- continue;
+ conflict = conflict || readBeforeWrite;
- LDBG() << "Checking op: "
- << OpWithFlags(op, OpPrintingFlags().skipRegions());
- if (!shouldMoveOutOfRegion(op, region) ||
- !canBeHoisted(op, definedOutside))
- continue;
+ LDBG() << ". . . . "
+ << "Resource conflict status updated to = " << conflict << "\n";
+
+ dstIt->second = std::make_pair(conflict, srcEffect);
+}
+
+/// Returns true if any of op's operands is defined inside the loop.
+static bool hasLoopVariantInput(LoopLikeOpInterface loopLike, Operation *op) {
+ return llvm::any_of(op->getOperands(), [&] (Value v) {
+ return !loopLike.isDefinedOutsideOfLoop(v);
+ });
+}
+
+/// Returns true if:
+/// (a) any of the resources used by op's Memory Effects have been
+/// flagged as having a conflict within the resourceConflicts map OR
+/// (b) op doesn't have a MemoryEffectOpInterface or has one but
+/// without any specific effects.
+static bool mayHaveMemoryEffectConflict(Operation *op,
+ MemoryConflictMap *resourceConflicts) {
+ LDBG() << "<Checking for memory effect conflict on op> : "
+ << OpWithFlags(op, OpPrintingFlags().skipRegions());
+
+ auto condSpecInterface = dyn_cast<ConditionallySpeculatable>(op);
+
+ // if op implements ConditionallySpeculatable interface, must be speculatable!
+ if (condSpecInterface && !isSpeculatable(op))
+ return true;
----------------
joker-eph wrote:
For example your test operations are not tagged as Speculatable right now as far as I can tell?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/155344
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list