[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][XeGPU] Add anchor_layout and update propagation to honor user-specified layouts (PR #169267)
Artem Kroviakov
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Wed Nov 26 03:05:26 PST 2025
================
@@ -385,19 +386,19 @@ gpu.module @test {
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[CST:.*]] = arith.constant {layout_result_0 = #xegpu.layout<lane_layout = [1, 16], lane_data = [1, 1]>} dense<0.000000e+00> : vector<8x16xf32>
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[T2:.*]]:3 = scf.for %{{.*}} iter_args(%[[ARG4:.*]] = %[[T0]], %[[ARG5:.*]] = %[[T1]], %[[ARG6:.*]] = %[[CST]]) ->
// CHECK-SAME: (!xegpu.tensor_desc<8x16xf16, #xegpu.layout<lane_layout = [1, 16], lane_data = [1, 1]>>, !xegpu.tensor_desc<16x16xf16, #xegpu.layout<lane_layout = [1, 16], lane_data = [2, 1]>>, vector<8x16xf32>) {
-// CHECK-NEXT: %[[T4:.*]] = xegpu.load_nd %[[ARG4]] {layout_result_0 = #xegpu.layout<lane_layout = [1, 16], lane_data = [1, 1]>} :
+// CHECK-NEXT: %[[T4:.*]] = xegpu.load_nd %[[ARG4]] <{layout = #xegpu.layout<lane_layout = [1, 16], lane_data = [1, 1]>}> {layout_result_0 = #xegpu.layout<lane_layout = [1, 16], lane_data = [1, 1]>} :
----------------
akroviakov wrote:
Why the redundancy between
```
<{layout = #xegpu.layout<lane_layout = [1, 16], lane_data = [1, 1]>}>
```
and
```
{layout_result_0 = #xegpu.layout<lane_layout = [1, 16], lane_data = [1, 1]>}
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169267
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list