[Mlir-commits] [llvm] [mlir] [Flang][OpenMP][Taskloop] Translation support for taskloop construct (PR #166903)
Tom Eccles
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Mon Nov 10 09:37:18 PST 2025
================
@@ -1933,6 +1933,205 @@ static Value *emitTaskDependencies(
return DepArray;
}
+OpenMPIRBuilder::InsertPointOrErrorTy OpenMPIRBuilder::createTaskloop(
+ const LocationDescription &Loc, InsertPointTy AllocaIP,
+ BodyGenCallbackTy BodyGenCB,
+ llvm::function_ref<llvm::Expected<llvm::CanonicalLoopInfo *>()> loopInfo,
+ Value *LBVal, Value *UBVal, Value *StepVal, bool Tied) {
+
+ if (!updateToLocation(Loc))
+ return InsertPointTy();
+
+ uint32_t SrcLocStrSize;
+ Constant *SrcLocStr = getOrCreateSrcLocStr(Loc, SrcLocStrSize);
+ Value *Ident = getOrCreateIdent(SrcLocStr, SrcLocStrSize);
+
+ BasicBlock *TaskloopExitBB =
+ splitBB(Builder, /*CreateBranch=*/true, "taskloop.exit");
+ BasicBlock *TaskloopBodyBB =
+ splitBB(Builder, /*CreateBranch=*/true, "taskloop.body");
+ BasicBlock *TaskloopAllocaBB =
+ splitBB(Builder, /*CreateBranch=*/true, "taskloop.alloca");
+
+ InsertPointTy TaskloopAllocaIP =
+ InsertPointTy(TaskloopAllocaBB, TaskloopAllocaBB->begin());
+ InsertPointTy TaskloopBodyIP =
+ InsertPointTy(TaskloopBodyBB, TaskloopBodyBB->begin());
+
+ if (Error Err = BodyGenCB(TaskloopAllocaIP, TaskloopBodyIP))
+ return Err;
+
+ llvm::Expected<llvm::CanonicalLoopInfo *> result = loopInfo();
+ if (!result) {
+ return result.takeError();
+ }
+
+ llvm::CanonicalLoopInfo *CLI = result.get();
+ OutlineInfo OI;
+ OI.EntryBB = TaskloopAllocaBB;
+ OI.OuterAllocaBB = AllocaIP.getBlock();
+ OI.ExitBB = TaskloopExitBB;
+
+ // Add the thread ID argument.
+ SmallVector<Instruction *, 4> ToBeDeleted;
+ // dummy instruction to be used as a fake argument
+ OI.ExcludeArgsFromAggregate.push_back(createFakeIntVal(
+ Builder, AllocaIP, ToBeDeleted, TaskloopAllocaIP, "global.tid", false));
+
+ OI.PostOutlineCB = [this, Ident, LBVal, UBVal, StepVal, Tied,
+ TaskloopAllocaBB, CLI, Loc,
+ ToBeDeleted](Function &OutlinedFn) mutable {
+ // Replace the Stale CI by appropriate RTL function call.
+ assert(OutlinedFn.hasOneUse() &&
+ "there must be a single user for the outlined function");
+ CallInst *StaleCI = cast<CallInst>(OutlinedFn.user_back());
+
+ // HasShareds is true if any variables are captured in the outlined region,
+ // false otherwise.
+ bool HasShareds = StaleCI->arg_size() > 1;
+ Builder.SetInsertPoint(StaleCI);
+
+ // Gather the arguments for emitting the runtime call for
+ // @__kmpc_omp_task_alloc
+ Function *TaskAllocFn =
+ getOrCreateRuntimeFunctionPtr(OMPRTL___kmpc_omp_task_alloc);
+
+ Value *ThreadID = getOrCreateThreadID(Ident);
+
+ // Emit runtime call for @__kmpc_taskgroup
+ Function *TaskgroupFn =
+ getOrCreateRuntimeFunctionPtr(OMPRTL___kmpc_taskgroup);
+ Builder.CreateCall(TaskgroupFn, {Ident, ThreadID});
+
+ // The flags are set to 1 if the task is tied, 0 otherwise.
+ Value *Flags = Builder.getInt32(Tied);
+
+ Value *TaskSize = Builder.getInt64(
+ divideCeil(M.getDataLayout().getTypeSizeInBits(Taskloop), 8));
+
+ Value *SharedsSize = Builder.getInt64(0);
+ if (HasShareds) {
+ AllocaInst *ArgStructAlloca =
+ dyn_cast<AllocaInst>(StaleCI->getArgOperand(1));
+ assert(ArgStructAlloca &&
+ "Unable to find the alloca instruction corresponding to arguments "
+ "for extracted function");
+ StructType *ArgStructType =
+ dyn_cast<StructType>(ArgStructAlloca->getAllocatedType());
+ assert(ArgStructType && "Unable to find struct type corresponding to "
+ "arguments for extracted function");
+ SharedsSize =
+ Builder.getInt64(M.getDataLayout().getTypeStoreSize(ArgStructType));
+ }
+
+ // Emit the @__kmpc_omp_task_alloc runtime call
+ // The runtime call returns a pointer to an area where the task captured
+ // variables must be copied before the task is run (TaskData)
+ CallInst *TaskData = Builder.CreateCall(
+ TaskAllocFn, {/*loc_ref=*/Ident, /*gtid=*/ThreadID, /*flags=*/Flags,
+ /*sizeof_task=*/TaskSize, /*sizeof_shared=*/SharedsSize,
+ /*task_func=*/&OutlinedFn});
+
+ // Get the pointer to loop lb, ub, step from task ptr
+ // and set up the lowerbound,upperbound and step values
+ llvm::Value *lb =
+ Builder.CreateStructGEP(OpenMPIRBuilder::Taskloop, TaskData, 5);
+ // Value *LbVal_ext = Builder.CreateSExt(LBVal, Builder.getInt64Ty());
+ Builder.CreateStore(LBVal, lb);
+
+ llvm::Value *ub =
+ Builder.CreateStructGEP(OpenMPIRBuilder::Taskloop, TaskData, 6);
+ Builder.CreateStore(UBVal, ub);
+
+ llvm::Value *step =
+ Builder.CreateStructGEP(OpenMPIRBuilder::Taskloop, TaskData, 7);
+ Value *Step_ext = Builder.CreateSExt(StepVal, Builder.getInt64Ty());
+ Builder.CreateStore(Step_ext, step);
+ llvm::Value *loadstep = Builder.CreateLoad(Builder.getInt64Ty(), step);
+
+ if (HasShareds) {
+ Value *Shareds = StaleCI->getArgOperand(1);
+ Align Alignment = TaskData->getPointerAlignment(M.getDataLayout());
+ Value *TaskShareds = Builder.CreateLoad(VoidPtr, TaskData);
+ Builder.CreateMemCpy(TaskShareds, Alignment, Shareds, Alignment,
+ SharedsSize);
+ }
+
+ // set up the arguments for emitting kmpc_taskloop runtime call
+ // setting default values for ifval, nogroup, sched, grainsize, task_dup
+ Value *IfVal = Builder.getInt32(1);
+ Value *NoGroup = Builder.getInt32(1);
+ Value *Sched = Builder.getInt32(0);
+ Value *GrainSize = Builder.getInt64(0);
+ Value *TaskDup = Constant::getNullValue(Builder.getPtrTy());
----------------
tblah wrote:
Taskloop works internally by duplicating the current task recursively until there are the right number of tasks to execute the loop with the requested degree of parallelism. I've only skimmed the code but I think it makes a direct copy of the task data structure allocated by the openmp runtime.
I wonder if we will need to use the task dup function for duplicating the task context structure allocated in OpenMPToLLVMIRConversion. Otherwise all of the tasks will share the same pointer to the same task context structure allocated in OpenMPToLLVMIRConversion.
Fixing this will take some work so I suggest we leave it as it is and land this patch emitting TODO when the task context structure isn't empty. Then someone can fix this in a follow up patch.
Does that sound okay to you?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/166903
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list