[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][tensor] Loosen restrictions on folding dynamic reshapes (PR #137963)

[Artem Gindinson]

================
@@ -28,67 +32,319 @@ mlir::getReassociationIndicesForReshape(ShapedType sourceType,
   return std::nullopt;
 }
 
-std::optional<SmallVector<ReassociationIndices>>
-mlir::getReassociationIndicesForCollapse(ArrayRef<int64_t> sourceShape,
-                                         ArrayRef<int64_t> targetShape) {
-  if (sourceShape.size() <= targetShape.size())
-    return std::nullopt;
-  unsigned sourceDim = 0;
-  SmallVector<ReassociationIndices> reassociationMap;
-  reassociationMap.reserve(targetShape.size());
+namespace {
+/// A simple struct to represent ReassociationIndices as an inclusive interval.
+/// It's designed to be feasibly minimal, so the call sites should manage the
+/// validity of the range manually.
+struct ReassociationIndexRange {
+  /// FIXME: Signed type is used for consistency with ReassociationIndices.
+  /// We should consider refactoring all reassociation utilities to use unsigned
+  /// types.
+  int64_t leftIdx = 0, rightIdx = 0;
+
+  /// Util for manual checks of the range's validity
+  LogicalResult verify() const {
+    return leftIdx >= 0 && (leftIdx <= rightIdx) ? success() : failure();
+  }
+
+  /// Checks range's containment within another range. Treats the edges
+  /// non-exclusively.
+  bool isInRange(const ReassociationIndexRange &outerRange) const {
+    return leftIdx >= outerRange.leftIdx && rightIdx <= outerRange.rightIdx;
+  }
+
+  unsigned size() const {
+    assert(succeeded(verify()));
+    return rightIdx - leftIdx + 1;
+  }
+  bool containsSingleIndex() const { return size() == 1; }
+
+  void expandRight() { ++rightIdx; }
+  void shrinkLeft() { ++leftIdx; }
----------------
AGindinson wrote:

Yep, these no longer make sense after I've added some proceed-with-caution comments for the struct

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137963