[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][Linalg] Introduce transpose/broadcast semantic to linalg.batch… (PR #130944)
Md Asghar Ahmad Shahid
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Fri May 2 07:59:40 PDT 2025
================
@@ -690,34 +690,32 @@ def MatmulOp : LinalgStructuredBase_Op<"matmul", [
Example Transpose:
```mlir
- linalg.matmul indexing_maps = [
- affine_map<(d0, d1, d2) -> (d2, d0)>, // transpose
- affine_map<(d0, d1, d2) -> (d2, d1)>,
- affine_map<(d0, d1, d2) -> (d0, d1)>
- ]
- ins(%arg0, %arg1 : memref<5x3xf32>,memref<5x7xf32>)
- outs(%arg2: memref<3x7xf32>)
+ linalg.matmul
----------------
shahidact wrote:
> Then why not re-use the definition from `linalg.contract` and begin standarisin things?
Yes we can, however linalg.contract is newer addition relatively.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130944
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list