[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][linalg] Extend `FuseElementwiseOps` pattern to work with named ops (PR #144922)

[llvmlistbot at llvm.org]

================
@@ -1014,3 +1014,24 @@ module {
 //   CHECK-DAG:     %[[T3:.+]] = arith.addf %[[T2]], %[[B1]]
 //       CHECK:     linalg.yield %[[T3]] : f32
 //       CHECK:   return %[[GENERIC]]
+
+// -----
+
+func.func @map_ops(%in1: tensor<8xf32>, %in2: tensor<8xf32>) -> tensor<8xf32> {
----------------
srcarroll wrote:

sure. I initially didn't go that far with tests because at the time my reasoning was that the logic is unchanged so should generalize. but then I ran across that one issue with the bb args, so I'm less convinced of that.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144922