[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][scf] fix getSuccessorRegions func in scf.forall (PR #147491)

[Mehdi Amini]

joker-eph wrote:

There can't be any "data" flowing from one instance of a parallel block to another.
I don't think they are ordered and having the dynamic iteration N+1 being the successor or the dynamic iteration N does not really makes sense to me?

I don't quite get why this was modeled this way in the first place though, I may be missing something here.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147491