[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir] List lead maintainers for MLIR (PR #146928)

[Renato Golin]

rengolin wrote:

> So basically I self-nominating myself, I got ignored/rejected by the area team

I'm not sure why you keep repeating it. Your nomination was acted upon as described by me above (now twice, so I won't repeat).

> I also got very conflicting messaging where one member of the area team said

IIUC, you got partial information from different people while they were deliberating on a very complicated subject and is now confused as to why the messaging wasn't complete and in unison?

> I would also think that there shouldn't be double standards: if you are asking me to elaborate on my objection to a nomination, I should be entitled to hear about objections to my initial self-nomination don't I?

There wasn't any. You nominated to "non tensor" and we didn't add you to tensor. I'm not sure I can phrase this in another way that is clearer. However, this PR is not about your nomination, but other people's. If you want to nominate yourself later, as you expressed earlier, you're free to do so in a separate PR.

> If you have concerns with the ability of the nominees to perform the duties of maintaining, please say so and explain what those concerns are. If you don't have those concerns, then please do not block the PR on your disagreement with what community policy is or should be.

Do you have concerns on these four people performing the high-level work of conflict resolution and general project management?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146928