[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][linalg] Extend Linalg elemwise named ops semantics (PR #122753)

[Andrzej Warzyński]

banach-space wrote:

> > e even sth from PyTorch or IREE? Such that most people could recognize it more intuitive
> 
> Whatever we choose to call it, we need to keep in mind that we will have two attributes that should be consistently named : `func_type/func_kind/opKind/computationKind....` (e.g. `add`) and `computation_type/ccumulator_type` ( e.g. `i32`) .

IIUC, we don't need "compute type" just now? Shall we cross that bridge when we get there and in the meantime prioritise consistency and use `kind` (@adam-smnk - I like your suggestion!)?



https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122753