[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][linalg] Extend Linalg elemwise named ops semantics (PR #122753)

Javed Absar llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Wed Jan 15 12:55:23 PST 2025


javedabsar1 wrote:

> e even sth from PyTorch or IREE? Such that most people could recognize it more intuitivel
Whatever we choose to call it, we need to keep in mind that we will have two attributes that should be consistent name --- `func_type/func_kind/opKind/computationKind....` (e.g. `add`) and `computation_type/ccumulator_type` ( e.g. `i32`) . 
Also should be consistent with whatever other new ops ... contract/pooling/... etc call and need .

How about   `comp_kind` and `comp_type` ? Maybe just vote with thums up/down, or suggest better ones.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122753


More information about the Mlir-commits mailing list