[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [MLIR] MPI: add `count` optional argument to communication ops (PR #129095)

[Christian Ulmann]

Dinistro wrote:

> i fear that the custom assembly format is gonna get very difficult to parse. in such case, is it okay if we ditch it temporarily and use the explicit format instead?

You can also delegate to a custom printer and parser which is backed by a C++ implementation in case some parts cannot be expressed. In general, we should aim for the non-generic format, as the other can be very verbose. Also not that switching to that would require test changes everywhere.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129095