[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [MLIR] Add pattern to bubble up tensor.extract_slice (PR #126898)
Andrzej WarzyĆski
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Thu Feb 27 06:37:22 PST 2025
================
@@ -210,6 +214,217 @@ struct BubbleUpExpandThroughParallelCollapse
}
};
+/// Converts `tensor.extract_slice(tensor.expand_shape)` to
+/// `tensor.expand_shape(tensor.extract_slice)`.
+/// For this transformation to be possible, the slice must be fully contiguous
+/// within each reassociation group of the expand_shape.
+/// A slice is defined as fully contiguous within a reassociation group if after
+/// flattening the reassociation group to a single 1D range, then the slice
+/// taken out of the group could be defined as a single contiguous subrange
+/// within that range.
+/// If the transformation is not possible, or if the slice is rank reducing, the
+/// function returns failure.
+///
+/// Example:
+/// ```
+/// %reshape = tensor.expand_shape %in [[0, 1], [2, 3], [4, 5, 6]]
+/// tensor<8x16x32xf32> to tensor<2x4x2x8x4x2x4xf32>
+/// %slice = tensor.extract_slice %reshape ...
+/// tensor<2x4x2x8x4x2x4xf32> to tensor<2x4x1x5x1x1x4xf32>
+///
+/// // The transformation is possible because each reassociation group has a
+/// // contiguous slice. (i.e., [2x4->2x4], [2x8->1x5], [4x2x4->1x1x4])
+/// // After the transformation:
----------------
banach-space wrote:
[nit] I would move above the code. This way you will also avoid "double" commenting.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126898
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list