[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][Linalg] Expose linalg.matmul and linalg.contract via Python API (PR #126377)

[Nicolas Vasilache]

nicolasvasilache wrote:

> Hi @nicolasvasilache,
> 
> Thanks for pointing that out! I have now changed the argument format to that of OpDSL-derived ops (I didn't check carefully enough what that format was and went with what seemed more consistent with the MLIR-style).
> 
> @rengolin and I both don't care much for which syntax we go with. I personally feel there isn't much value in allowing the alternative style now for just a couple ops (versus allowing it/switching over all linalg ops at once). If others do have a preference for switching/allowing the alternative style now, I am happy to comply.

SGTM, thanks for fixing!

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126377