[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][RemoveDeadValues] Fix affine.for induction variable incorrectly removed (PR #172612)
Francisco Geiman Thiesen
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Wed Dec 17 09:57:26 PST 2025
================
@@ -327,6 +328,32 @@ RunLivenessAnalysis::RunLivenessAnalysis(Operation *op) {
solver.load<LivenessAnalysis>(symbolTable);
LDBG() << "Initializing and running solver";
(void)solver.initializeAndRun(op);
+
+ // Mark block arguments of RegionBranchOpInterface ops that are NOT successor
+ // inputs as live. These include induction variables (IVs) like those in
+ // affine.for or scf.for. The fix in visitBranchOperand() only handles this
+ // when non-forwarded operands exist, but ops like affine.for with constant
+ // bounds have no non-forwarded operands, so visitBranchOperand() is never
+ // called. We must handle this case here during initialization.
+ op->walk([&](RegionBranchOpInterface regionBranchOp) {
----------------
FranciscoThiesen wrote:
Yes we can, thanks for the suggestion:
In the last commit:
- Merged the two separate op->walk() calls into a single traversal
- The walk now visits all operations once, and for each:
a. If it's a RegionBranchOpInterface, mark non-successor-input args live
b. Create dead states for values without liveness info (unreachable code handling)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/172612
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list