[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][tensor] Loosen restrictions on folding dynamic reshapes (PR #137963)

[Ian Wood]

================
@@ -31,59 +31,70 @@ mlir::getReassociationIndicesForReshape(ShapedType sourceType,
 std::optional<SmallVector<ReassociationIndices>>
 mlir::getReassociationIndicesForCollapse(ArrayRef<int64_t> sourceShape,
                                          ArrayRef<int64_t> targetShape) {
-  if (sourceShape.size() <= targetShape.size())
+  unsigned numSourceDims = sourceShape.size(),
+           numTargetDims = targetShape.size();
+  if (numSourceDims <= numTargetDims)
     return std::nullopt;
-  unsigned sourceDim = 0;
-  SmallVector<ReassociationIndices> reassociationMap;
-  reassociationMap.reserve(targetShape.size());
-
-  ReassociationIndices currIndices;
-  int64_t prodOfCollapsedDims = 1;
-  while (sourceDim < sourceShape.size()) {
-    unsigned targetDim = reassociationMap.size();
-    // If we have mapped all the target dimensions stop and handle the remaining
-    // tail of size-1 dimensions explicitly.
-    if (targetDim == targetShape.size())
-      break;
+  SmallVector<ReassociationIndices, 4> reassociationMap;
+  reassociationMap.reserve(numTargetDims);
 
+  unsigned sourceDim = 0, targetDim = 0;
+  for (; targetDim < numTargetDims; ++targetDim) {
     int64_t currTargetShape = targetShape[targetDim];
-    while (sourceDim < (sourceShape.size() - 1) &&
-           sourceShape[sourceDim] != ShapedType::kDynamic &&
-           prodOfCollapsedDims * sourceShape[sourceDim] < currTargetShape) {
+    ReassociationIndices currIndices;
+    // 1. Target dimension is dynamic. Source shape should contain at least
+    // one dynamic dimension.
+    if (currTargetShape == ShapedType::kDynamic) {
----------------
IanWood1 wrote:

> In its current form, the algorithm safely bails out on ?x?x? -> ?x?.

Maybe I missed something but I thought it was folding in this case.


>  would you prefer to see a rewrite in scope of the current PR

If this also fixes `?x?x? -> ?x?` it probably makes sense to have a followup for a generalized solution

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137963