[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][vector] Canonicalize/fold 'order preserving' transposes (PR #135841)

[James Newling]

newling wrote:


> We tend to say "non-unit dims" 😉 I hope I'm not being overly pedantic by suggesting using that wording in this PR as well. (Also, ESL here — so feel free to suggest something else if you prefer!)

> Quite possibly there’s no need to be so strict with "scalable" vectors (thanks for checking!) — let me experiment and confirm, probably tomorrow.

Thanks! 

> We tend to say "non-unit dims" 😉 I hope I'm not being overly pedantic by suggesting using that wording in this PR as well. (Also, ESL here — so feel free to suggest something else if you prefer!)

This is useful info, I don't want to create unnecessary fragmentation. Will update this PR. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135841