[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][XeGPU] Extend SGMapAttr and Add ConvertLayoutOp (PR #132425)
Chao Chen
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Fri Apr 4 07:39:27 PDT 2025
================
@@ -154,33 +154,111 @@ def XeGPU_FenceScopeAttr:
let assemblyFormat = "$value";
}
-def XeGPU_SGMapAttr : XeGPUAttr<"SGMap", "sg_map"> {
+def XeGPU_LayoutAttr : XeGPUAttr<"Layout", "layout"> {
let summary = [{
- Describes the mapping between work item (WI) and the 2D tensor specified by the tensor descriptor.
+ Describes the data distribution to subgroups and work-items for a tensor
+ specified by the tensor descriptor.
}];
let description = [{
- To distribute the XeGPU operation to work items, the tensor_desc must be specified with the sg_map
- attribute at the tensor description creation time.
- Within the `sg_map`, `wi_layout` specifies the layout of work items,
- describing the mapping of work items to the tensor.
- wi_layout[0] x wi_layout[1] must be equal to the total number of work items within a subgroup.
- `wi_data` specifies the minimum number of data elements assigned to each work item for a single distribution.
-
- E.g., #xegpu.sg_map<wi_layout = [1, 16], wi_data = [1, 1]>
- In this example, the subgroup has 16 work items in wi_layout=[1, 16],
- each accessing 1 element as specified by wi_data=[1, 1].
-
- `wi_data[0] * wi_data[1]` can be greater than 1, meaning that each work item operates on multiple elements,
- which is eventually lowered to "SIMT-flavor" vector, like SPIR-V vector or llvm vector, or packed to a storage data type.
- The multiple elements indicated by `wi_data` can only be from one dimension and must be contiguous in the memory along either dimension.
+ XeGPU operations use `LayoutAttr` to define how data is distributed across subgroups and work-items.
+ This attribute is specified in tensor descriptors during tensor description creation. `LayoutAttr`
+ includes the following parameters:
+
+ * `sg_layout`: Specifies the total number of subgroups and their layout within a workgroup.
+ It is mandatory for workgroup-level programming and optional for subgroup programming. Its
+ presence implies workgroup-level code.
----------------
chencha3 wrote:
Oh, sorry, my bad. It is not valid for subgroup programming.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132425
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list