[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][SCF] Add support for loop pipeline peeling for dynamic loops. (PR #106436)

Thomas Raoux llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Tue Sep 3 13:04:40 PDT 2024


================
@@ -640,70 +636,113 @@ LogicalResult LoopPipelinerInternal::createKernel(
   return success();
 }
 
-void LoopPipelinerInternal::emitEpilogue(
-    RewriterBase &rewriter, llvm::SmallVector<Value> &returnValues) {
+LogicalResult
+LoopPipelinerInternal::emitEpilogue(RewriterBase &rewriter,
+                                    llvm::SmallVector<Value> &returnValues) {
+  Location loc = forOp.getLoc();
   // Emit different versions of the induction variable. They will be
   // removed by dead code if not used.
+
+  // bounds_range = ub - lb
+  // total_iterations = (bounds_range + step - 1) / step
+  Type t = lb.getType();
+  Value minus1 =
+      rewriter.create<arith::ConstantOp>(loc, rewriter.getIntegerAttr(t, -1));
+  Value boundsRange = rewriter.create<arith::SubIOp>(loc, ub, lb);
+  Value rangeIncr = rewriter.create<arith::AddIOp>(loc, boundsRange, step);
+  Value rangeDecr = rewriter.create<arith::AddIOp>(loc, rangeIncr, minus1);
+  Value totalIterations = rewriter.create<arith::DivUIOp>(loc, rangeDecr, step);
+
+  SmallVector<Value> predicates(maxStage + 1);
   for (int64_t i = 0; i < maxStage; i++) {
-    Location loc = forOp.getLoc();
-    Type t = lb.getType();
-    Value minusOne =
-        rewriter.create<arith::ConstantOp>(loc, rewriter.getIntegerAttr(t, -1));
-    // number of iterations = ((ub - 1) - lb) / step
-    Value totalNumIteration = rewriter.create<arith::DivUIOp>(
-        loc,
-        rewriter.create<arith::SubIOp>(
-            loc, rewriter.create<arith::AddIOp>(loc, ub, minusOne), lb),
-        step);
-    // newLastIter = lb + step * ((((ub - 1) - lb) / step) - i)
+    // iterI = total_iters - 1 - i
+    // May go negative...
     Value minusI =
         rewriter.create<arith::ConstantOp>(loc, rewriter.getIntegerAttr(t, -i));
+    Value iterI = rewriter.create<arith::AddIOp>(
+        loc, rewriter.create<arith::AddIOp>(loc, totalIterations, minus1),
+        minusI);
+    // newLastIter = lb + step * iterI
     Value newlastIter = rewriter.create<arith::AddIOp>(
-        loc, lb,
-        rewriter.create<arith::MulIOp>(
-            loc, step,
-            rewriter.create<arith::AddIOp>(loc, totalNumIteration, minusI)));
+        loc, lb, rewriter.create<arith::MulIOp>(loc, step, iterI));
+
     setValueMapping(forOp.getInductionVar(), newlastIter, maxStage - i);
+
+    if (dynamicLoop) {
+      // pred = iterI >= lb
+      predicates[i + 1] = rewriter.create<arith::CmpIOp>(
+          loc, arith::CmpIPredicate::sge, iterI, lb);
+    }
   }
+
   // Emit `maxStage - 1` epilogue part that includes operations from stages
   // [i; maxStage].
   for (int64_t i = 1; i <= maxStage; i++) {
+    SmallVector<std::pair<Value, unsigned>> returnMap(returnValues.size());
     for (Operation *op : opOrder) {
       if (stages[op] < i)
         continue;
+      unsigned currentVersion = maxStage - stages[op] + i;
+      unsigned nextVersion = currentVersion + 1;
       Operation *newOp =
           cloneAndUpdateOperands(rewriter, op, [&](OpOperand *newOperand) {
             auto it = valueMapping.find(newOperand->get());
             if (it != valueMapping.end()) {
-              Value replacement = it->second[maxStage - stages[op] + i];
+              Value replacement = it->second[currentVersion];
               newOperand->set(replacement);
             }
           });
+      if (dynamicLoop) {
+        OpBuilder::InsertionGuard insertGuard(rewriter);
+        newOp = predicateFn(rewriter, newOp, predicates[currentVersion]);
+        if (!newOp)
+          return failure();
+      }
       if (annotateFn)
         annotateFn(newOp, PipeliningOption::PipelinerPart::Epilogue, i - 1);
-      for (unsigned destId : llvm::seq(unsigned(0), op->getNumResults())) {
-        setValueMapping(op->getResult(destId), newOp->getResult(destId),
-                        maxStage - stages[op] + i);
+
+      for (auto [opRes, newRes] :
+           llvm::zip(op->getResults(), newOp->getResults())) {
+        setValueMapping(opRes, newRes, currentVersion);
         // If the value is a loop carried dependency update the loop argument
         // mapping and keep track of the last version to replace the original
         // forOp uses.
         for (OpOperand &operand :
              forOp.getBody()->getTerminator()->getOpOperands()) {
-          if (operand.get() != op->getResult(destId))
+          if (operand.get() != opRes)
             continue;
-          unsigned version = maxStage - stages[op] + i + 1;
           // If the version is greater than maxStage it means it maps to the
           // original forOp returned value.
-          if (version > maxStage) {
-            returnValues[operand.getOperandNumber()] = newOp->getResult(destId);
-            continue;
-          }
-          setValueMapping(forOp.getRegionIterArgs()[operand.getOperandNumber()],
-                          newOp->getResult(destId), version);
+          unsigned ri = operand.getOperandNumber();
+          returnValues[ri] = newRes;
+          Value mapVal = forOp.getRegionIterArgs()[ri];
+          returnMap[ri] = std::make_pair(mapVal, currentVersion);
+          if (nextVersion <= maxStage)
+            setValueMapping(mapVal, newRes, nextVersion);
+        }
+      }
+    }
+    if (dynamicLoop) {
+      // Select return values from this stage (live outs) based on predication.
+      // If the stage is valid select the peeled value, else use previous stage
+      // value.
+      for (auto pair : llvm::enumerate(returnValues)) {
+        unsigned ri = pair.index();
+        auto [mapVal, currentVersion] = returnMap[ri];
+        if (mapVal) {
----------------
ThomasRaoux wrote:

yes please include en example I'm not sure I understand in what case that would be needed. 
My thinking is that if the value doesn't escape the loop then any uses of an op that was predicated should be also predicated, therefore we shouldn't need the select

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106436


More information about the Mlir-commits mailing list