[Mlir-commits] [mlir] 469f9d5 - [MLIR][Affine] Rewrite fusion helper hasNonAffineUsersOnPath for efficiency (#115588)
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Fri Nov 15 01:39:10 PST 2024
Author: Uday Bondhugula
Date: 2024-11-15T15:09:06+05:30
New Revision: 469f9d5fb8fcfe7dc42baa2daa7e230147f234de
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/469f9d5fb8fcfe7dc42baa2daa7e230147f234de
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/469f9d5fb8fcfe7dc42baa2daa7e230147f234de.diff
LOG: [MLIR][Affine] Rewrite fusion helper hasNonAffineUsersOnPath for efficiency (#115588)
The hasNonAffineUsersOnPath utility used during fusion was terribly
inefficient in its approach. Rewrite it efficiently to simply work based
on use lists (sparse) instead of having to traverse all nodes of an MDG
repeatedly and all operands of all ops of each node in the relevant
range.
On large models (with 10s of thousands of loop nests), this reduces
fusion pass time by nearly 2x (cutting down several tens of seconds).
Added:
Modified:
mlir/lib/Dialect/Affine/Transforms/LoopFusion.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/Affine/Transforms/LoopFusion.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/Affine/Transforms/LoopFusion.cpp
index 5891e2fa0067ed..6fefe4487ef59a 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/Affine/Transforms/LoopFusion.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/Affine/Transforms/LoopFusion.cpp
@@ -343,61 +343,48 @@ static Value createPrivateMemRef(AffineForOp forOp, Operation *srcStoreOpInst,
return newMemRef;
}
-/// Walking from node 'srcId' to node 'dstId' (exclusive of 'srcId' and
-/// 'dstId'), if there is any non-affine operation accessing 'memref', return
-/// true. Otherwise, return false.
-static bool hasNonAffineUsersOnThePath(unsigned srcId, unsigned dstId,
- Value memref,
- MemRefDependenceGraph *mdg) {
- auto *srcNode = mdg->getNode(srcId);
- auto *dstNode = mdg->getNode(dstId);
- Value::user_range users = memref.getUsers();
- // For each MemRefDependenceGraph's node that is between 'srcNode' and
- // 'dstNode' (exclusive of 'srcNodes' and 'dstNode'), check whether any
- // non-affine operation in the node accesses the 'memref'.
- for (auto &idAndNode : mdg->nodes) {
- Operation *op = idAndNode.second.op;
- // Take care of operations between 'srcNode' and 'dstNode'.
- if (srcNode->op->isBeforeInBlock(op) && op->isBeforeInBlock(dstNode->op)) {
- // Walk inside the operation to find any use of the memref.
- // Interrupt the walk if found.
- auto walkResult = op->walk([&](Operation *user) {
- // Skip affine ops.
- if (isa<AffineMapAccessInterface>(*user))
- return WalkResult::advance();
- // Find a non-affine op that uses the memref.
- if (llvm::is_contained(users, user))
- return WalkResult::interrupt();
- return WalkResult::advance();
- });
- if (walkResult.wasInterrupted())
- return true;
- }
- }
- return false;
+/// Returns true if there are any non-affine uses of `memref` in any of
+/// the operations between `start` and `end` (both exclusive). Any other
+/// than affine read/write are treated as non-affine uses of `memref`.
+static bool hasNonAffineUsersOnPath(Operation *start, Operation *end,
+ Value memref) {
+ assert(start->getBlock() == end->getBlock());
+ assert(start->isBeforeInBlock(end) && "start expected to be before end");
+ Block *block = start->getBlock();
+ // Check if there is a non-affine memref user in any op between `start` and
+ // `end`.
+ return llvm::any_of(memref.getUsers(), [&](Operation *user) {
+ if (isa<AffineReadOpInterface, AffineWriteOpInterface>(user))
+ return false;
+ Operation *ancestor = block->findAncestorOpInBlock(*user);
+ return ancestor && start->isBeforeInBlock(ancestor) &&
+ ancestor->isBeforeInBlock(end);
+ });
}
-/// Check whether a memref value in node 'srcId' has a non-affine that
-/// is between node 'srcId' and node 'dstId' (exclusive of 'srcNode' and
-/// 'dstNode').
-static bool hasNonAffineUsersOnThePath(unsigned srcId, unsigned dstId,
- MemRefDependenceGraph *mdg) {
- // Collect memref values in node 'srcId'.
- auto *srcNode = mdg->getNode(srcId);
+/// Check whether a memref value used in any operation of 'src' has a
+/// non-affine operation that is between `src` and `end` (exclusive of `src`
+/// and `end`) where `src` and `end` are expected to be in the same Block.
+/// Any other than affine read/write are treated as non-affine uses of memref.
+static bool hasNonAffineUsersOnPath(Operation *src, Operation *end) {
+ assert(src->getBlock() == end->getBlock() && "same block expected");
+
+ // Trivial case. `src` and `end` are exclusive.
+ if (src == end || end->isBeforeInBlock(src))
+ return false;
+
+ // Collect relevant memref values.
llvm::SmallDenseSet<Value, 2> memRefValues;
- srcNode->op->walk([&](Operation *op) {
- // Skip affine ops.
- if (isa<AffineForOp>(op))
- return WalkResult::advance();
+ src->walk([&](Operation *op) {
for (Value v : op->getOperands())
// Collect memref values only.
if (isa<MemRefType>(v.getType()))
memRefValues.insert(v);
return WalkResult::advance();
});
- // Looking for users between node 'srcId' and node 'dstId'.
+ // Look for non-affine users between `src` and `end`.
return llvm::any_of(memRefValues, [&](Value memref) {
- return hasNonAffineUsersOnThePath(srcId, dstId, memref, mdg);
+ return hasNonAffineUsersOnPath(src, end, memref);
});
}
@@ -884,7 +871,7 @@ struct GreedyFusion {
// escaping memrefs so we can limit this check to only scenarios with
// escaping memrefs.
if (!srcEscapingMemRefs.empty() &&
- hasNonAffineUsersOnThePath(srcId, dstId, mdg)) {
+ hasNonAffineUsersOnPath(srcNode->op, dstNode->op)) {
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs()
<< "Can't fuse: non-affine users in between the loops\n");
continue;
@@ -1247,8 +1234,8 @@ struct GreedyFusion {
// Skip if a memref value in one node is used by a non-affine memref
// access that lies between 'dstNode' and 'sibNode'.
- if (hasNonAffineUsersOnThePath(dstNode->id, sibNode->id, mdg) ||
- hasNonAffineUsersOnThePath(sibNode->id, dstNode->id, mdg))
+ if (hasNonAffineUsersOnPath(dstNode->op, sibNode->op) ||
+ hasNonAffineUsersOnPath(sibNode->op, dstNode->op))
return false;
return true;
};
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list