[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][Vector] Implement transferXXPermutationLowering as MaskableOpRewritePattern (PR #91987)
Andrzej WarzyĆski
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Thu May 16 13:38:41 PDT 2024
================
@@ -285,10 +303,14 @@ struct TransferWriteNonPermutationLowering
newInBoundsValues.push_back(op.isDimInBounds(i));
}
ArrayAttr newInBoundsAttr = rewriter.getBoolArrayAttr(newInBoundsValues);
- rewriter.replaceOpWithNewOp<vector::TransferWriteOp>(
- op, newVec, op.getSource(), op.getIndices(), AffineMapAttr::get(newMap),
- newMask, newInBoundsAttr);
- return success();
+ auto newWrite = rewriter.create<vector::TransferWriteOp>(
+ op.getLoc(), newVec, op.getSource(), op.getIndices(),
+ AffineMapAttr::get(newMap), newMask, newInBoundsAttr);
+ if (newWrite.hasPureTensorSemantics())
+ return newWrite.getResult();
+ // In memref case, MaskableOpRewritePattern cannot replaceOp with result.
----------------
banach-space wrote:
I think that this is fine, but how come `permutation_with_mask_xfer_write_fixed_width` works with this change? This doesn't have `PureTensorSemantics`, does it?
```
vector.transfer_write %vf0, %mem[%base1, %base2], %mask
{permutation_map = affine_map<(d0, d1) -> (d0)>, in_bounds = [false]}
: vector<7xf32>, memref<?x?xf32>
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91987
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list