[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][emitc] Add EmitC lowering for arith.trunci, arith.extsi, arith.extui (PR #91491)
Corentin Ferry
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Sun May 12 23:31:25 PDT 2024
================
@@ -112,6 +112,78 @@ class CmpIOpConversion : public OpConversionPattern<arith::CmpIOp> {
}
};
+template <typename ArithOp, bool needsUnsigned>
+class CastConversion : public OpConversionPattern<ArithOp> {
+public:
+ using OpConversionPattern<ArithOp>::OpConversionPattern;
+
+ LogicalResult
+ matchAndRewrite(ArithOp op, typename ArithOp::Adaptor adaptor,
+ ConversionPatternRewriter &rewriter) const override {
+
+ Type opReturnType = this->getTypeConverter()->convertType(op.getType());
+ if (!isa_and_nonnull<IntegerType>(opReturnType)) {
+ return rewriter.notifyMatchFailure(op, "expected integer result type");
+ }
+
+ if (adaptor.getOperands().size() != 1) {
+ return rewriter.notifyMatchFailure(
+ op, "CastConversion only supports unary ops");
+ }
----------------
cferry-AMD wrote:
For multi-line statements like this one, I was [asked to put braces](https://github.com/Xilinx/llvm-project/pull/177#discussion_r1593501937). The LLVM [coding standards](https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#don-t-use-braces-on-simple-single-statement-bodies-of-if-else-loop-statements) do not give out rules for this specific case, but I'd like to make up my mind -- is there an LLVM officially accepted practice on this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91491
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list