[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][intrange] Fix `arith.shl` inference in case of overflow (PR #91737)
Felix Schneider
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Fri May 10 09:17:46 PDT 2024
ubfx wrote:
> ... wait, hold on, does that use of SExtValue()/ZExtValue() cause problems with, say, `i128`?
True, that might be a problem. I'll look into it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91737
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list